I’m just a little disgruntled. I’m not sure if I was quoted out of context in an attempt to make it appear I was saying something I wasn’t, or if I’m making too much of it, or if my remark was really so imprecise that he didn’t know what point I was trying to make.
I felt that the question was intended to make me say that the security fix was applied only to 2.0 because 1.3 is intrinsically more secure. That’s not really the case. If anything, I think that 2.0 is probably more secure, simply because it is more thoroughly designed. But on both versions, security holes are fixed as soon as they are found. So if we thought that one was more secure than the other, that would be immediately rectified.
I dunno. I’m probably making too much of it.